Archive

Author Archive

Web Quiz: My Style of American Catholicism

November 3rd, 2005 No comments

I suppose these results aren’t terribly surprising … I’m so “new”, I’m not yet Catholic. And I do love Pope John Paul II of happy memory, and I do feel as if I’m rediscovering a lost faith.

The 2% “Liberal Catholic” result would explain my disconnect with the official ECUSA party line on … well, just about everything.


You scored as New Catholic. The years following the Second Vatican Council was a time of collapse of the Catholic faith and its traditions. But you are a young person who has rediscovered this lost faith, probably due to the evangelization of Pope John Paul II. You are enthusiastic, refreshing, and somewhat traditional, and you may be considering a vocation to the priesthood or religious life. You reject relativism and the decline in society that you see among your peers. You are seen as being good for the Church.

A possible problem is that you may have a too narrow a view of orthodoxy, and anyway, you are still a youth and not yet mature in your faith.

New Catholic

79%

Traditional Catholic

60%

Evangelical Catholic

59%

Neo-Conservative Catholic

59%

Lukewarm Catholic

33%

Radical Catholic

19%

Liberal Catholic

2%

What is your style of American Catholicism?
created with QuizFarm.com

Categories: Catholic Tags:

Catholic Envy

October 30th, 2005 No comments

I was meditating a bit upon Lepanto, and fell into a moderate case of Catholic envy.

After all, the Catholic church has these wonderfully triumphalistic feasts such as Christ the King and Our Lady of Victory.

I’m pretty sure as Episcopalians, our corresponding feasts are of Jesus the Really Nice Rabbi and Our Lady of Perpetual Dialogue.

Now that I’m envious and depressed, I think I’ll go read The Ballad of the White Horse as an antidote (“hair of the dog”, perhaps?). At least we haven’t taken Alfred the Great off of the list of feasts yet.

Crass Commercialism

October 30th, 2005 No comments

The NEW Eclectic Amateur! Now, with ads from Google!

We’ll see if this is beneficial or baneful …

Categories: Blogdom Tags:

A Very Old Distributist Tract

October 21st, 2005 No comments

Dale mentioned the other day (I am unsure how much in jest) that it was “time to start collecting those distributist books.

There’s one I’m sure he already has — the Bible. It was my attempt, some years ago, to read through all of the Bible that got me started down the path of distributist thinking.

This version of Psalm 37 is the translation from the 1979 Book of Common Prayer, and was this morning’s appointed reading. How could it not be dear to any agrarian/distributist’s heart?

37

Part I Noli aemulari

  1. Do not fret yourself because of evildoers; *
    do not be jealous of those who do wrong.
  2. For they shall soon wither like the grass, *
    and like the green grass fade away.
  3. Put your trust in the LORD and do good; *
    dwell in the land and feed on its riches.
  4. Take delight in the LORD, *
    and he shall give you your heart’s desire.
  5. Commit your way to the LORD and put your trust in him, *
    and he will bring it to pass.
  6. He will make your righteousness as clear as the light *
    and your just dealing as the noonday.
  7. Be still before the LORD *
    and wait patiently for him.
  8. Do not fret yourself over the one who prospers, *
    the one who succeeds in evil schemes.
  9. Refrain from anger, leave rage alone; *
    do not fret yourself; it leads only to evil.
  10. For evildoers shall be cut off, *
    but those who wait upon the LORD shall possess the land.
  11. In a little while the wicked shall be no more; *
    you shall search out their place, but they will not be there.
  12. But the lowly shall possess the land; *
    they will delight in abundance of peace.
  13. The wicked plot against the righteous *
    and gnash at them with their teeth.
  14. The Lord laughs at the wicked, *
    because he sees that their day will come.
  15. The wicked draw their sword and bend their bow
    to strike down the poor and needy, *
    to slaughter those who are upright in their ways.
  16. Their sword shall go through their own heart, *
    and their bow shall be broken.
  17. The little that the righteous has *
    is better than great riches of the wicked.
  18. For the power of the wicked shall be broken, *
    but the LORD upholds the righteous.
Categories: Agrarian, Distributism Tags:

Divining what's wrong with the Episcopal Church today

September 28th, 2005 No comments

Seen in the October, 2005 Ann Arbor Observer calendar of events:

spiritsisters Women’s Circle.
All women invited to discuss spirituality, relationships, empowerment, metaphysics, and healing. Short meditation session. Bring divination tools, if you like. Temple Beth Emeth/St. Clare’s Episcopal Church, 2309 Packard. $3. 741-0478.

At least they’re not hosting a group whose practices are are really offensive to what the Episcopal Church stands for — you know, like those nasty knuckle-dragging Boy Scouts.

When men tell you to consult mediums and spiritists, who whisper and mutter, should not a people inquire of their God? Why consult the dead on behalf of the living?
Isaiah 8:19 (NIV)

God have mercy.

Categories: Episcopaganism Tags:

Timing is everything

September 13th, 2005 No comments

So, the entire crew of us went to see yesterday’s Tigers game at Comerica Park. (I didn’t know that I’d miss Michigan and Trumble, the Only True Home™ of the Tigers, so much, but that’s another story …)

It was a beautiful day for a baseball game, sunny and hot, but with a breeze. Marring the perfection, however, was the blaring of the speakers directly above our heads as we sat 4 rows below maximum nosebleed.

I was coping, but Nancy was developing a horrific headache. It didn’t help that the Princess Rachel, in her cheering enthusiasm, had developed a rather piercing shriek to her constant “Go Tigers! Go Tigers!”

By the fifth inning, Nancy had to finally tell Rachel to please tone it down. “Save it for when someone hits a home run.”

Rachel, disappointed but obedient, puts on her sad face, quietly nods her assent …

CRACK!

… and Brandon Inge knocks it out of left field for a tie-breaking two-run homer.

“Yay Tigers! Yay Tigers!”

The sheer choreography of it was breathtaking, and a thing of beauty. 🙂

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Q & A Time

August 10th, 2005 No comments

Time for some question-and-answer about the general state of the Episcopal Church:


Q: I’m so tired of hearing about gay bishops!

A: So am I.

Q: Isn’t this a lot of trouble to go to over one bishop?

A: If it were only one! Unfortunately, the problems in ECUSA run far deeper than V. Gene Robinson, and would still be there if Bishop Robinson were to resign or even to be deposed as a bishop.

Q: Like what?

A: “Minor” things like denial of the authority of the Bible, denial of the resurrection of Jesus, and denial of His Lordship and uniqueness, and even worhip of other gods.

Q: Those are pretty negative things to say. Shouldn’t you be staying positive?

A: OK, I’m positive that the bishops of ECUSA have, as a whole, shown themselves to be party to all of the above.

Q: You’re just bitter about Gene Robinson’s appointment at GC2003.

A: Actually, Robinson’s approval as bishop (bad enough as that was) wasn’t the worst thing to come out of that general convention. Resolution B001 was.

Q: Resolution what?

A: Resolution B001. It called for reaffirming that the ECUSA holds that Scripture is still authoritative (as stated in the Articles of Religion) and that the statements in the Book of Common Prayer outlining what we believe as Episcopalians to be fundamental to the Faith (“the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral of 1886, 1888”) are still held to be true.

Q: That sounds like it ought to be non-controversial. What’s your problem with that?

A: It was voted down, by a majority of bishops (66-84, 8 abstensions, to be exact).

Q: Oh. So what exactly does ECUSA believe now?

A: Good question. I would guess it depends on a working majority of General Convention votes, but it’s hard to tell.

Q: But isn’t the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion big enough to contain these differences?

A: No Church is big enough to be both Christian and non-Christian.

Q: Whoa! Who are you to judge anyone else’s faith?

A: Who do I have to be? Look, it’s a simple matter of truth in labelling: someone can be a very nice person, but if their religion doesn’t believe the Bible is authoritative, revealed Scripture, that Jesus died for our sins and is raised from the dead, or hold to the historic Creeds of the Church, I don’t see how it can in any honest sense be called “Christian.” Maybe “Deist” or “Unitarian Universalist” or “Pagan”, but not “Christian.”

Q: Yeah, right. You say to-MAY-to, I say ta-MAH-to — this is really because you hate and fear gay people, right?

A: You’re one of those people who uses the words “listening” and “dialogue” a lot, aren’t you?

Categories: Episcopal Church Tags:

Factory chickens, factory schools

August 3rd, 2005 No comments

Another stealth homeschooling endorsement:

The mindset that leads to consolidation in agriculture, so evident in the chicken business, has also taken place to an alarming degree in human culture, especially in consolidated schooling. Just as we herd more animals into confinement buildings, we herd more children into classrooms. Then we have little choice but to follow the rule of the chicken factory: one size fits all. And we justify both kinds of concentration camps with that all-American article of faith: it’s cheaper per unit; we can’t afford to do otherwise. Then we wonder why we must de-beak the chickens and frisk schoolchildren for firearms.

From All Flesh Is Grass, by Gene Logsdon (p. 137)

Categories: Agrarian, Homeschooling Tags:

It's Not All About Gene

August 1st, 2005 No comments

One of the more pernicious effects of the election and consecration of V. Gene Robinson as Bishop of New Hampshire (and of the sexual morality “debate” in ECUSA and the Anglican Communion) is the way that any serious discussion of the moral and theological disaster overtaking ECUSA can be dismissed as “homophobia”.

Especially if it gets to the level of “what should we then do?” and of taking action. No, “listening” and “dialogue” (as those words are currently used) are not actions, but ways of avoiding taking action. More precisely, they are ways of having “conservatives” avoid taking action while “liberals” merrily continue doing more and more of what they wish.

Categories: Episcopal Church Tags:

Standing By Words

July 21st, 2005 No comments

Wendell Berry, on the importance of being current:

Contemporaneity, is the sense of being “up with the times,” is of no value. Wakefulness to experience — as well as to instruction and example — is another matter. But what we call the modern world is not necessarily, and not often, the real world, and there is no virtue in being up-to-date with it. It is a false world, based upon economies and values and desires that are fantastical — a world in which millions of people have lost any idea of the materials, the disciplines, the restraints, and the work necessary to support human life, and have thus become dangerous to their own lives and to the possibility of life. The job now is to get back to that perennial and substantial world in which we really do live, in which the foundations of our life will again be visible to us, and in which we can accept our responsibilities again within the conditions of necessity and mystery. In that world all wakeful and responsible people, dead, living, and unborn, are contemporaries. And that is the only contemporaneity worth having.

— Wendell Berry, Standing By Words, (p. 13)

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: